Three-Fifths Compromise on representation
On July 12, 1787, delegates in Philadelphia adopted the three-fifths formula, counting part of the enslaved population for representation and direct taxation.
On July 12, 1787, delegates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia adopted the three-fifths formula for apportioning representation and direct taxation. James Wilson of Pennsylvania and Roger Sherman of Connecticut supported a compromise under which three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted for seats in the House of Representatives. The vote joined slavery directly to the structure of the new national legislature.
The compromise addressed a political struggle between northern and southern delegates over whether enslaved people would increase the power of slaveholding states in Congress. Southern delegates wanted enslaved laborers counted for representation, while several northern delegates objected that states should not gain political power from people held in bondage. The July bargain therefore tied representation, taxation, and slavery together inside the Constitution itself.
The three-fifths formula entered Article I, Section 2 and shaped presidential elections as well as House apportionment for decades. Its political consequences lasted until the Civil War amendments, especially the Fourteenth Amendment, replaced the compromise after emancipation.
Outcome
The immediate result of Three-Fifths Compromise on representation appeared in Great Compromise creates bicameral Congress, which carried its consequences into the next stage of American history.
Sources
- National Park Service
- American Battlefield Trust
- Britannica
- Library of Congress
- U.S. State Department milestones
Related Events
Great Compromise creates bicameral Congress
1787 / Founding Era
Slave trade compromise
1787 / Founding Era